> Skip repeated content

Saphenous Nerve Block vs. Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Effectiveness Study in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

IRB Number: 2012-033
inactive

November 22, 2011

Institutional Review Board, Hospital for Special Surgery

The safety of our participants is our top priority. The trial/study is approved and periodically reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), which includes doctors, administrators, ethicists, and members of the general public. The safety of clinical trials is reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Before enrolling in a clinical trial or research study, the investigator will explain the purpose of the trial/study, its expected benefits, any possible risks or side effects, and what your role will be. If you want to join the trial/study, you must sign informed consent documents. You can leave a trial/study at any time without penalty.

For further information, see Understanding Clinical Trials/Research Studies.

Principal Investigator

Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD

Co-Investigators

David H. Kim, MD
Mary F. Chisholm, MD
Kethy M. Jules-Elysee, MD
Yan Ma, MD
Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, MD
Lazaros Poultsides, MD
Thomas P. Sculco, MD
Thomas Danninger, MD
Carey Ford
Jodie Curren, RN
Isabelle Kao
Heather Reel
Daniel Yoo

Summary

Our study will compare the use of saphenous nerve blocks performed at the adductor canal versus femoral nerve blocks for total knee replacements in the same patient undergoing a bilateral procedure. We hypothesize that the saphenous nerve block performed at the level of the adductor canal provides adequate pain relief without significantly compromising muscle strength, enabling patients to mobilize early and possibly be discharged earlier to the rehabilitation center.
We will enroll a total of 60 patients. Before and after surgery, we will assess pain levels and motor strength of the operative legs by using a hand held dynamometer. We will also record patients’ pain scores, physical therapy progress and satisfaction up to 48 hours.
If our study proves the saphenous nerve block to be an effective method of postoperative pain control without compromising quadriceps strength, it would be seen as a better alternative to femoral nerve blocks. 

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria
All patients ages 40-80 undergoing primary bilateral total knee arthroplasty
Planned use of neuraxial anesthesia
Ability to follow study protocol

Exclusion Criteria
Contraindication to a spinal or epidural anesthetic
Not candidate for bilateral total knee arthroplasty
Chronic opioid use (defined as daily or almost daily use of opioids for >3 months)
Hypersensitivity and/or allergy to local anesthetics
Intraoperative use of any volatile anesthetic
Patients with a pre-existing neuropathy on the operative limb
      - Contraindication to a femoral nerve block or saphenous nerve block
      - Allergy to any of the study medications
      - ASA Class 4-5
      - Non-English speaking patients